Saturday, March 08, 2008

Platonov at The Hayloft

Checkov Recut: Platonov
Antonin Chekhov
The Hayloft Project
Until 16th March

It is sometimes painfully evident that fashion in Melbourne theatre is predictably cyclical. Every few years a new coterie of artists emerges with their re-invented wheels and we all do the “Independent theatre’s been reinvigorated” two step.
And along comes the Hayloft Project reinterpreting the classics.
Simon Stone became the name to know with his purportedly brilliant adaption of Wedekind’s Spring Awakening. He returns to us this year with an adaption of Platonov in a brand spankin’ rundown ex industrial venue out in Footscray.
The venue is grungy and hip, in sight of shipping containers, and makes clever use of converted packing crates and school desks in the foyer. It would all be so exciting if it didn’t have the faintest whiff of been there done that about it. Cautionary words then for Simon Stone should be Wax and Storeroom.
To the production itself - I have to say that even though we’ve suffered a slew of well meaning issues plays over the last three or four years, I still don’t find the trials of bored middle class yobs particularly interesting. Certainly it’s an exploration of the darker side of desire and intellect, but in all honesty, shallow and mean people are shallow and mean people whether they’re brilliantly observed by Chekhov or luridly paraded by E News.
And perhaps it’s just me but isn’t there something a little self aggrandizing about the artistic director of the company, directing the play and casting himself in the main role? Particularly as it’s a role in which he gets to bluster about, be cleverly mean to everyone and snog all the pretty girls. Plus, watching Stone in the star role I just can’t help but think of James Adler’s fatal attraction to Hamlet.
But beyond issues of ego, Stone doesn’t quite pull it off as he’s consistently outclassed by he fellow cast members, though it’s hardly surprising when he’s surrounded by some of the most talented young actors in town, including Jessamy Dyer, Angus Grant and Meredith Penman.
Stone’s best bet would be to concentrate on his skill for adaption and interpretation. It’s not often I hate something enough in the first act to compare it to Don’s Party and then be defending it as genius by the second. But, while we were outside having a cigarette and deciding we should probably stick around (after all we’d come all this way) inside Stone had turned the play inside out with some very clever choices. Suddenly everything I’d thought was a tediously bad decision in the first act became an ironic stroke of genius in the second, forcing us to reflect on the nature of the middle class in Australia, and the range of pitch black emotion that it’s possible for actors to find in desperately uninteresting characters.
A play, and I suspect a company, not for the impatient nor for the general “I don’t usually get theatre” public, but a play definitely worth seeing if you think you know your shit. Ultimately, the word that keeps coming back to me to describe The Hayloft’s Platonov is “Clever”.

Danny Episode

3 Comments:

At 2:44 pm, Blogger Alison Croggon said...

I was told, after I had made more or less the same point, that Simon Stone was forced to take over the role of Platonov late in rehearsals after the original actor withdrew.

I'm puzzled that you think it's all so old hat. How, precisely? Myself, I think there's quite a big difference between E-News and Chekhov, and just as big a gap between Chekhov and David Williamson. Plays are much more than what they're supposedly "about". Strange you didn't mention the design...they couldn't possibly fit a set like that into the Store Room...

 
At 9:47 pm, Blogger DannyEpisode said...

Hey Alison, nice to have such an illustrious audience as you and chris.

I'm still not totally sold on Simon taking the lead late into rehearsals... I mean, okay, we've all had to step in at the last moment on something but i think the way the role was played still made it look like an ego driven act. You could argue i suppose that the role calls for whatever it calls for, but i think if the given circumstances of the performance are such that the AD, Director and adapter are playing the lead, it has to be taken into account in the performance. I've got no answer as to how but then that's really the challenge for the actor in that situation.

What i mostly found old hat about the experience was the ideas of "exciting new fringe venue" and "reinventing the classics". Checkov himself i wouldn't describe as old hat (though i have to say i'd prefer to see more new australian writing for the stage being mounted - and yes, there's a place for the classics as much as new work and i'd certainly prefer a reinterpretation to a museum piece - it's just a personal bent, being an australian playwright i can't help but want more of our own new writing out there particularly as i still feel like it's so poorly served in town these days.)

But i digress... I find the excitement about a new theatre venue a little bitterly tinged in the light of the slow heat death of the storeroom and the long ago perishing of wax.

I also think plays are more than what they're "about" but what they are about is undeniably a large part of the play and i just find people being carelessly mean to each other something less than interesting. That aspect of the play however was really only teeth grinding in the first act (Graham Kennedy australian accents and hawaiian shirts and all). By the second act my opinion had dramatically shifted as all that horrible middle class whining was stripped away. It felt to me more like all the things i hated in the first act were held up to ridicule by the second act, of which i heartily approved. Maybe that wasn't clear in the review.

Set wise, well, i liked it for the first five minutes or so but after that it didn't do much for me. I'm not really into "striking design" as such and i'd be far more impressed by a stunning use of the space itself, rather than curtaining it off and building something in the middle of it. That's gotta be a beautiful building after all. So, no, they couldn't have done that in the storeroom, but they could easily have done it in the Merlyn. A well known academic once said to me of sets at MTC "well, why don't you just put a big bag of money on stage." and i've never quite shaken that.

Glad to have you reading and always been a fan. Nice to have to some critical debate about the theatre these days. Such a shame it doesn't happen in the papers anymore - a more widely disseminated forum for this kind of discussion might help give the performing arts back their sense of legitimacy in the community.

 
At 1:16 pm, Blogger Unknown said...

http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35165568&postID=1603960514829757490&isPopup=true
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35165568&postID=1615333106126209864&isPopup=true
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35165568&postID=6258927534703883727&isPopup=true
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35165568&postID=7499220134763930748&isPopup=true
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=35165568&postID=8900042033201886931&isPopup=true
http://tvisfurniture.blogspot.com/2008/09/time-is-not-yet-ripe.html
http://tvisfurniture.blogspot.com/2008/09/red-sky-morning.html
http://tvisfurniture.blogspot.com/2008/06/love-monkey.html
http://tvisfurniture.blogspot.com/2008/06/rio-saki-and-other-falling-debris.html
http://tvisfurniture.blogspot.com/2008/03/sammy-j-and-forest-of-dreams.html
http://tvisfurniture.blogspot.com/2008/03/nightshift.html
http://tvisfurniture.blogspot.com/2008/03/platonov-at-hayloft.html
http://tvisfurniture.blogspot.com/2008/03/bones-love-gringo.html
http://tvisfurniture.blogspot.com/2007/01/golem-of-ruckers-hill.html
http://tvisfurniture.blogspot.com/2008/02/asylum.html

 

Post a Comment

<< Home